The redemptive-historical hermeneutic is a method of interpreting Scripture that views the Bible as a unified story centered on God’s plan of redemption through Jesus Christ. It emphasizes how all of Scripture, from Genesis to Revelation, unfolds progressively, culminating in Christ and His work of salvation. This hermeneutic seeks to interpret individual passages within the broader framework of God’s redemptive purposes, ensuring Christ remains central to biblical interpretation.
Key Features of the Redemptive-Historical Hermeneutic
Christ-Centered Focus: Every text is understood in light of its relationship to Christ, whether it points forward to Him (Old Testament), reveals Him (Gospels), or expounds His work (Epistles). This follows Jesus’ own teaching in Luke 24:27, where He explained how the Scriptures testify about Him.
Biblical Unity: The Bible is treated as a cohesive narrative rather than a collection of isolated texts. Themes such as creation, fall, redemption, and consummation are traced throughout Scripture.
Covenantal Framework: It emphasizes the unfolding of God’s covenants (e.g., with Adam, Noah, Abraham, Moses, David, and the New Covenant in Christ) as central to understanding redemptive history.
Historical Progression: Redemptive history unfolds progressively. Earlier events and institutions, such as the Exodus or the tabernacle, are seen as types and shadows fulfilled in Christ (Hebrews 10:1).
How It Differs from Other Hermeneutical Approaches
Moralistic or Exemplary Hermeneutic
Description: Focuses on finding moral lessons or examples for personal application in biblical narratives.
Example: David defeating Goliath is interpreted as a call to “face your giants” in life.
Contrast: The redemptive-historical approach sees David as a type of Christ, the ultimate King who defeats sin and death on behalf of His people. While moral lessons may exist, they are secondary to the redemptive focus.
Grammatical-Historical Hermeneutic
Description: Seeks to understand the original meaning of a text by examining its grammar, syntax, historical context, and authorial intent.
Example: A prophecy in Isaiah is studied in its immediate historical and cultural context without necessarily linking it to Christ.
Contrast: The redemptive-historical hermeneutic includes these elements but goes further by interpreting texts in the broader context of redemptive history, affirming Christ as their ultimate fulfillment.
Dispensational Hermeneutic
Description: Divides redemptive history into distinct dispensations or periods, emphasizing literal interpretation of prophecy and a sharp distinction between Israel and the Church.
Example: Old Testament promises to Israel are seen as distinct from those made to the Church, awaiting literal future fulfillment.
Contrast: The redemptive-historical approach views the Church as the fulfillment of Israel’s promises in Christ, seeing the two as united in God’s redemptive plan (e.g., Galatians 3:28–29, Ephesians 2:11–16).
Reader-Response Hermeneutic
Description: Focuses on how a reader or community interprets the text, often downplaying authorial intent or historical context.
Example: The meaning of a text is shaped by the reader’s context, leading to potentially subjective interpretations.
Contrast: The redemptive-historical approach grounds interpretation in the objective reality of Christ’s work and the biblical authors’ Spirit-inspired intentions.
Which Hermeneutic Is Right?
The redemptive-historical hermeneutic aligns most closely with the Bible’s self-testimony and the interpretive methods used by Jesus and the apostles. Consider the following:
Jesus’ Teaching: In Luke 24:27, Jesus expounded the Scriptures as testifying about Himself. The redemptive-historical approach follows this example by interpreting all Scripture as pointing to Christ.
Apostolic Preaching: Peter and Paul consistently interpreted the Old Testament in light of its fulfillment in Christ (e.g., Acts 2:16–36, Acts 13:32–41, 1 Corinthians 10:1–11).
Biblical Unity: The redemptive-historical approach honors the unity and divine authorship of Scripture, recognizing how individual texts contribute to God’s overarching redemptive plan.
Other hermeneutical methods, such as the grammatical-historical approach, offer valuable tools for understanding the text’s original meaning. However, these tools must be used within the broader framework of redemptive history to rightly interpret Scripture’s ultimate purpose: the glory of God in the redemption of sinners through Christ.
Conclusion
The redemptive-historical hermeneutic is the most faithful method of interpreting Scripture because it maintains Christ as the interpretive center of the Bible, unifying its diverse parts into a coherent redemptive narrative. While other approaches may provide useful insights, they fall short if they fail to recognize Christ as the fulfillment of all Scripture. As Reformed theologians often affirm, “The New Testament is in the Old concealed; the Old Testament is in the New revealed.” This hermeneutic captures that profound truth.
Leave a comment